Duck 1982 relationship dissolution following

Relationship Dissolution |

duck 1982 relationship dissolution following

associated with divorce (Heaton, ), but having a child after marriage .. quently cited are those put forth by Knapp (), Duck (), Baxter (). Steve Duck (, ) suggested that the dissolution of relationships is an extended process composed of several different parts, which might be either. The interpersonal communication that occurs during a relationship deterioration/ dissolution looks to explain the possible "why" behind the relationship breakup and the communication steps that a breakup seems to follow. . Steve Duck's ( ) four stages of relationship dissolution, each very distinctive with specific.

This development sees the negotiations and completion of a breakup as something intimately intertwined with the other projects and activities that the two people conduct in their daily lives, involving the same sorts of conversational processes. Duck's Model Steve Ducksuggested that the dissolution of relationships is an extended process composed of several different parts, which might be either sequential or compounded.

duck 1982 relationship dissolution following

In this approach the breakup of a relationship is not simply an event that occurs and to which two partners react. Rather it is a long-term psychological process involving internal reflection, discussion with a partner, consultation with social networks, and the creation of personally satisfying stories about the history of the relationship from beginning to end.

The first Intrapsychic Phase of this process involves an individual brooding on the fact that the relationship is not satisfactory in some way from his or her perspective. Although the complaints may be voiced to other people, the point here is that the persons complained to do not personally know the partner complained of. The point of this stage is mostly to vent for example, to a hair-dresser, bartender, or distant colleague at workbut not to convey to the partner that dissatisfaction is felt.

Such dissatisfaction may be about such things as partner's habits, feeling trapped in a relationship, a sense of injustice about distribution of effort, or a sense of hopelessness about resolution of an argument. In fact nothing more may come of the brooding: The person feels a sense of grievance but does not necessarily proceed to the next stage if the process of venting or reflection is adequate to relieve the sense of negativity about the relationship.

Such brooding may be a recurrent activity, and probably occurs in most relationships at some time or another without leading to breakup. Alternatively, if the brooding Intrapsychic Phase does not result in satisfaction of the grievance by itself then the person moves to the next stage.

The Dyadic Phase emerges when the couple is confronted with the dissatisfaction experienced by one or both partners such that the dyad needs to discuss and evaluate it. Again, such discussions can be constructive and might lead to a rapprochement in the relationship or they can be threatening and unpleasant.

Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution - Wikipedia

Likewise, they could be recurrent complaints extended over a long period or sudden announcements of new concerns. Such discussion might be a shock to one partner, but in any case, it is likely that each person will be confronted with unknown perspectives on the relationship presented by the other person. Each person will have a view of the relationship and when challenged to present it as an individual, the person may break ranks from the usual points of view of the relationship that both members of the couple have previously shared.

The tenor and outcome of the Dyadic Phase will be a large factor in the way that things proceed from it. One person may be determined to leave and proceed to do so, or both may want to give things another shot. It is only if things proceed to the next stage that the relationship gets into very serious difficulty that begins an almost unstoppable process of dissolution. The next phase, a Social Phase, involves the social networks in which the dyad is necessarily embedded—all those other people whose lives intertwine with the couple or one of its members.

Such people are not neutral observers but tend to comment on relationships and on the ways in which they are conducted, voicing opinions and common wisdom about how people "should" react to marital transgressions or to difficulties in relationships. Any dyad needs to exist within such groups and is therefore accountable to them to some extent.

Such accounting, advice, and comparison go on throughout a relationship, not only when it is in trouble, but also are particularly important when a relationship hits the rocks. Dyad members then urgently consult with their associates to account for the breakdown of the relationship, or receive advice on how to stay together and deal with the difficulties.

At this point, however, the breakdown becomes a social event—not merely something between the two members of the couple—and therefore becomes "official.

duck 1982 relationship dissolution following

However, it is important to note that the breakup of a given dyad in a relationship network has fallout for other relationships also. Relationships with couple friends, the partner's work associates, the partner's family, and so on may all dissolve because of the termination of the primary relationship. Of course, relationship dissolution creates a psychological toll on one or both members, members of the network who do not want to see the relationship endand children.

Rarely does a relationship end that has no consequence for anyone else.

The Stages of Breaking Up | aloftyexistence

Last comes the Grave-Dressing Phase. An important and under-recognized feature of the breakup of relationships is the need for people to publish a record of the relationship and its death. For various reasons, both psychological and social, people "need" to justify themselves to other people and, in particular, to offer an account of the breakup that shows them in a favorable light relative to relational standards in the society.

Such stories typically suggest that the breakup was inevitable and necessary for the person to bring about, or else maturely and mutually agreed, or else that the speaker was somehow duped or betrayed by the other person. Such stories serve a social function in placing the speaker in a good light that does not negatively affect their "face" for future relationships, as well as indicating that they are thinking and mature relaters—or innocent victims—who have learned a useful lesson.

This sort of story is important for those people who seek to negotiate future relationships of a similar sort to the one lost. Relationships after Breakup When researchers have examined relationships of couples after divorce or breakup they have most often examined the relationships of noncustodial parents with their children, although there is also work on the consequences of broken dating relationships e.

Most research suggests that relationships between ex-spouses have typically been acrimonious or difficult but the existence of children gives them little choice about meeting. If they take their roles as parents seriously then they will need to continue to interact in order to consider and discuss the future of the children or to see one another at social or educational events involving the children.

duck 1982 relationship dissolution following

Recent research has shown a more complicated picture with several examples of good relationships between ex-partners, some of whom report closer friendships after divorce than when they were married. You work out an explanation for yourself and others for why the relationship broke down.

You then turn to family and friends for affirmation, support, and advice.

The Art of Breaking-up

In discussion, you will tend to blame the other partner or circumstances for the relationship ending; rarely will you focus on yourself. The Grave-Dressing Phase This is a time of coping with the relationship being over. You need to put the relationship behind you and move on. You create a rationale that is acceptable to you for why the relationship dissolved. You reinterpret events of the past in a way which soothes your feelings of guilt and loss of self-worth and identity.

You rethink their ideas of your ex-partner. Above all, you have to rationalize your past feelings in a way which decreases the significance of your ex-partner and failed relationship.

Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution

You need to protect your self-concept of yourself as a person who understands relationships and is capable of a new and more gratifying relationship. But every break-up will go through these phases, in one way or another. Do you recognize these stages?